PRSA ExecutiveBlog Logo
  • Home
  • About PRSA
  • Membership
  • Professional Development
  • Publications
  • Resources
  • PRSA Home

Currently viewing and reading

Public Relations Won’t Fix Penn State’s Crisis

Posted by Keith Trivitt and Arthur Yann  in November 9th 2011  
Tweet

Every day, public relations professionals help people understand the reasons why an organization says and does the things it says and does.

But one thing public relations professionals cannot help people understand, and should never have to, are an organization’s moral and legal failings.

Example: The ongoing crisis at Penn State, which entails its failure to report allegations of sexual abuse of minors by former Nittany Lions assistant football coach, Jerry Sandusky, to the proper legal authorities. (Update, Nov. 10, 2011: Penn State fired Mr. Paterno and University President Graham Spanier Wednesday night.)

Already, the media and some in the PR industry have anointed this unspeakable tragedy an example of a “public relations catastrophe” (so says The New York Times) and a moment in which a well-known brand failed to properly understand the modern reputational challenges of the digital age.

It is none of that. It’s time we stop describing gross managerial missteps, operational failures, lying, cheating, fraud and, in this case, systematic legal and moral failings as a public relations _________ (insert “disaster,” “nightmare” or “debacle”). Frankly, a public relations disaster is trying to set the Guinness Record for the world’s largest Popsicle on a hot summer day.

Anyone who thinks public relations can be counted on to “sweep up after the parade” and serve in the role of savior for something as tragic and awful as the recent events at Penn State is fooling themselves. In the immortal words of Arthur W. Page, public relations is 90 percent what you do, and only 10 percent what you say.

There’s very little a public relations professional could say that would fix this mess.

At PRSA, we talk a lot about the business value of public relations; its ability to change attitudes and behaviors toward some of the world’s most pressing social issues. We have an advocacy program, “The Business Case for Public Relations™,” built around this concept.

But one thing our profession should never do is take advantage of tragic situations to boost public relations’ value. Now is not the time to hold up public relations as the soap that can wash away Penn State’s sins.

Because public relations can’t fix failures of moral and legal obligations, let alone those that appear driven by big-time college athletics and efforts to protect the reputation of the winningest coach in Division I college football. That takes a cultural shift within an organization that goes far beyond public relations’ scope.

Hey, we’ll be the first to point out when situations can employ public relations to address reputational issues and restore trust. Our profession has long asserted that public relations professionals are in a unique position to serve as organizational “conscience,” and deserve a seat at the CEO’s table on that basis alone. But it seems to us to be almost like ambulance chasing for public relations professionals to make themselves look smart at someone else’s expense by bloviating about out “what Penn State should have done.”

No amount of public relations will fix Penn State’s failings. Had the allegations of sexual impropriety been reported to University Relations Vice President, Bill Mahon, public relations might have prevented this from ever becoming a crisis, and even may have burnished Penn State’s reputation for “doing the right thing” in the process. We’re willing to bet that, right now, Mr. Mahon is wishing someone would have reported the allegations to him.

We’ll step off our soapbox now. But we think it’s important that, as a profession, we don’t overreach and try to uphold our work as the savior for every societal tragedy and crisis. Doing so makes us look opportunistic and foolish considering the gravity of the situation.

Let’s give the human element of this tragic situation the respect it deserves. After all, you never hear a doctor saying, “I never would have resected his bowel like that … ”

Arthur Yann, APR, is PRSA’s vice president, public relations. Keith Trivitt is PRSA’s associate director, public relations.

Update 1 (12:15 p.m. EST, Nov. 10, 2011): Added a paragraph addressing how Penn State might have appropriately used its in-house PR counsel to address the issue before it came to light.

Update 2 (2:15 p.m. EST, Nov. 10, 2011): If any PR pros at universities have advice or insight on effect crisis comms at the university level, please send to keith.trivitt@prsa.org for inclusion in a future post.

under: Advocacy, Crisis Communications, Ethics, Reputation
Tags: Crisis Communications, Joe Paterno, penn state, PR, public relations, Reputation, Value of PR
Share: Digg it del.icio.us Facebook Stumble it Technorati Twitter

Related Post

  • No Grand Slam for Miami Marlins’ PR Practices (April 23rd, 2012)
  • A CEO’s Most Powerful Tool is Communications (April 18th, 2012)
  • Infographic: Measuring PR Pros’ Engagement with Wikipedia (April 17th, 2012)
  • What the USC Annenberg GAP Study Tells Us About Public Relations’ Success (April 12th, 2012)
  • Reviewing the FDA’s Proposed Social Media Guidelines (April 9th, 2012)
← Older Comments
  • Anonymous

    In my public relations career that has spanned over 4 decades I have had many occasion to march behind the elephants with a shovel and broom in hand. As a profession we spend a great deal of time developing crisis response plans. On the one hand that’s a wise thing to do; on the other we have collectively learned that we often wind up there. We even award honors to outstanding crisis response programs. I wish we could find a way to establish a “crisis avoided” Silver Anvil to honor the professionals who have earned the trust and respect of top management, have scanned the environment for areas of risk and championed policy and practice to reduce or eliminate risk to reputation. During the period alleged incidents of sexual abuse of minors was taking place on the Penn State campus, the sexual abuse of minors by clergy was front-page headline news across the country. Our duty as public relations professionals is to connect the dots and raise warning flags: does our organization have relationships with minors or vulnerable adults where we may have exposure to risk? Do we have policies and practices in place to minimize the risk of harm? Do we have proper reporting procedures in place?  If we learn to ask questions like this, we should find ourselves with a broom and shovel in hand much less frequently.

  • JOcampo

    I agree with the
    writers that PR alone cannot fix the Penn State crisis.  I’ve been reading a lot of articles and it
    seems that most journalists and communications professionals are pointing out
    the university’s PR mistakes but forgetting to mention that you can’t use
    public relations to fix a problem that has more to do with huge management
    failures than public relations failures. It’s the sort of thought that this
    problem can be “PR’ed” away that gives people the wrong impression of what public
    relations professionals do. I do believe, like the writers of this post, that
    Bill Mahon could have helped this situation from being a crisis had he known
    about it before and that PR will contribute to Penn State getting out of this
    crisis, but I don’t believe Mahon or the Ketchum team alone can make this
    situation go away.  Strategic
    communications coming from the university will only be successful if they can
    be traced back to actual, right, business decisions.

     

    At the end of
    the day, the only thing that could have prevented this crisis is to have done
    something, anything about Sandusky and the allegations against him in 1998, 2000
    or even 2002. Then, a public relations team could have used the morally correct
    decision to do something about the accused individual to reinstate the trust between
    the public and Penn State. 

  • Npounovich

    I
    completely agree with this post.  The
    ordeal at Penn State is not a crisis for the school or for the football
    program; it is a crisis for the well-being of the young boys who were sexually
    abused.  PR professionals should not be
    held responsible for cleaning up a mess that could have been prevented had
    officials been notified years ago. 

    In
    realistic terms, what could a PR person do to clean up a mess like this?  Call a press conference and issue an
    apology?  I don’t think that or any other
    tactic could salvage the program at this point, and it should not salvage the
    program.  PR people are constantly being
    critiqued on acting ethically, and even attempting to smooth out this situation
    would, in my opinion, be unethical.
    Unless something is dug up and revealed that all of these claims against
    the Penn State defensive coach were lies, I think PR people should stay away
    from this case.  Once new coaches and
    athletic directors are appointed, then the PR people can step in to highlight the
    new administration’s goals for the “new” program.

  • Natpoun

    I completely agree with this post.  The ordeal at Penn State is not a crisis for
    the school or for the football program; it is a crisis for the well-being of
    the young boys who were sexually abused.
    PR professionals should not be held responsible for cleaning up a mess
    that could have been prevented had officials been notified years ago. 

    In realistic terms, what could a PR person do to
    clean up a mess like this?  Call a press
    conference and issue an apology?  I don’t
    think that or any other tactic could salvage the program at this point, and it
    should not salvage the program.  PR
    people are constantly being critiqued on acting ethically, and even attempting
    to smooth out this situation would, in my opinion, be unethical.  Unless something is dug up and revealed that
    all of these claims against the Penn State defensive coach were lies, I think
    PR people should stay away from this case.
    Once new coaches and athletic directors are appointed, then the PR
    people can step in to highlight the new administration’s goals for the “new”
    program.

  • Gprato

         I agree with the authors of this article.
    The terrible events that have occurred at Penn State at the hands of Jerry
    Sandusky are not cause for a Public Relations swoop in and save reputation. What
    has occurred here is not an error of judgment or even a “mistake” but rather a
    social and moral tragedy; one that should cause key figures involved, the
    university administration overall and other schools, colleges and universities
    to pause and consider whether or not they have created a truly safe environment
    for students.

     

    It is a well-known fact that
    college campuses are not taking enough preventative or punitive action against
    sexual assault; this situation is yet another unfortunate reminder of that fact.
    Campuses should be implementing programs especially where young children at a
    summer camp are concerned.

     

    As far as I am concerned a
    PR guardian angel couldn’t save the Penn State at this point and furthermore
    shouldn’t. This is a moral disaster and should be treated as such. Public
    Relations should not be viewed as the sunshine cleaning service to mop up legal
    messes. Last time I checked that was what attorney’s were for? I really hope
    Joe Amendola knows what he has gotten himself into. Speaking of which, he himself
    has a very interesting backstory. When he was 49-years-old Amendola had
    relations with a 16-year-old client who fathered his child and who he later
    married. And the plot thickens.  It now
    doesn’t surprise me that the creep told NBC’s Bob Costas that he would trust
    Sandusky around his children.

     

    My attitude toward the whole
    situation is one of sadness and disgust. How are parents supposed to trust school
    officials and employees who claim to work in a safe learning environment around
    their children? I would think twice.

  • Bkempton

    I agree with the author of this post and many of the users who have commented that simply a public relations campaign cannot fix the Penn State crisis. The fact that the sexual abuse was kept secret and under wraps for so long is in a way its own crisis, a crisis that gives many public relations professionals in ethical practice areas an undeserved negative reputation. While the Penn State community was trying to hide Sandusky’s abuse because they thought it would protect the reputation of both the school and the football program, it only caused a snowball effect, which resulted in something far beyond a public relations nightmare. 

    If Sandusky’s sexual abuse had been reported in a timely fashion, this could have resulted in the abuse of much fewer victims and Sandusky could have been handled by legal authorities, leaving the rest of the Penn State community out of the spotlight, and showing the management at the university as having a conscience. 

    I really like the line in this blog post that says “now is not the time to hold up public relations as the soap that can wash away Penn State’s crisis.” It is true that public relations cannot fix or erase moral failures and legal obligations. The entire cultural atmosphere at Penn State needs to be reconsidered and this also holds true for all large universities and athletic programs in the country. This is far beyond a public relations crisis, and more of an organizational and cultural crisis.

  • Pingback: December Issue: Future of Media Round-up @ Bateman Banter

  • Pingback: PRSAY: Penn State is a tragedy that PR can’t fix « LtOthePEZ's Blog

← Older Comments
« Thinking of Using a Fake News Site? Think Again.
The #Occupy Movement Owes Much of Its Success to PR »

Subscribe to the PRSA blog.

  • Feed Icon via RSS Feed or eMail


    Your email is safe. Privacy Policy.

Welcome



PRSAY is a forum for PRSA members and other public relations professionals to engage in a dialogue with PRSA leaders, exchange viewpoints, and share perspectives on issues of concern to the Society and the public relations industry as a whole. The views and opinions expressed here are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the official policies or positions of PRSA.

Search

Join PRSA

  • With your PRSA membership, you will:

    • Stay on top of emerging public relations trends and industry news.
    • Be a part of a vibrant community of more than 22,000 public relations professionals.
    • Accelerate your career -- at any level.

PRSA on Twitter

#prsa on Twitter

Categories

    • #PRin2012 (13)
    • Accreditation (8)
    • Advocacy (150)
    • Awards (4)
    • Black History Month (10)
    • Board of Directors (17)
    • bylaws (7)
    • Careers (11)
    • Chapters (9)
    • Conferences (4)
    • Counselors Academy (4)
    • Crisis Communications (13)
    • CSR (5)
    • Districts (3)
    • Diversity (26)
    • Ethics (73)
    • Financial (7)
    • Friday Five (17)
    • Governance (12)
    • Guest Posts (44)
    • Industry Trends (62)
    • Intelligence (13)
    • International Conference (7)
    • Learning (10)
    • Measurement (5)
    • Member Benefits (17)
    • Membership (12)
    • Multicultural Marketing (3)
    • National Assembly (13)
    • Network (2)
    • Networking (6)
    • Nominating Committee (3)
    • Professional Development (16)
    • PRSA Foundation (2)
    • PRSA Leadership (25)
    • PRSA News (38)
    • PRSSA (8)
    • Public Affairs (4)
    • Public Relations Defined (3)
    • Public relations measurement (5)
    • Publications (3)
    • Pulse of the Profession (36)
    • recession (7)
    • Regulation (1)
    • Regulatory Issues (8)
    • Reputation (37)
    • Research (11)
    • Resources (10)
    • Sections (5)
    • Silver Anvil (2)
    • Social Media (29)
    • State of the Society (12)
    • Technology (1)
    • The Business Case for Public Relations (46)
    • The PRSA Interview (1)
    • Trust (24)
    • Uncategorized (17)
    • Universal Accreditation Board (1)
    • Video (2)
    • Web site (1)

Archives

Recent Entries

  • Friday Five: Measurement as a Second Language
  • Why Professional Communicators Should Care About CISPA
  • Friday Five: Advertising Faces Challenges in a Digital and Social Age
  • Friday Five: Key Learnings in a Social Landscape
  • No Grand Slam for Miami Marlins’ PR Practices

Recent Comments

  • Marvin Gurgold in A Tribute to Jean Way Schoonover (1…
  • Dennielle Howes… in Analysis: PR Lessons From The Penn …
  • Facebook, Burso… in PR Pros: Haven’t We Learned Anyth…
  • Link Ch. 12 … in Occupy Wall Street Abandoned PR 101…
  • Stop Worrying a… in Merely ‘Image Men’? Hardly

Most Comments

  • Public Relations Won’t Fix Penn State’s Crisis  (48)
  • Paid or Unpaid, Time to Evaluate PR's Use of Interns (34)
  • To Remove — or Not To Remove — the APR Requirement for Board Service (31)
  • ‘Prize-Rigging’ Can Undermine Your Brand’s Online Promotion (27)
  • #PRin2012: 12 Trends That Will Change Public Relations  (27)
©2008-2012 PRSAY – What Do You Have to Say?
Powered by WordPress 3.3.1
Box-Tube Box Modulize WordPress Theme By Dezzain Studio
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Membership
  • Professional Development
  • Publications
  • Resources
  • PRSA Home
  • Blog Policy