PR Training

Five Tips to Bring Your Online Releases into the 21st Century

Write more effective online news releases by following the five tips described by Wylie as part of her PRSA public relations training session, “Anatomy of a 2.0 Release.”

Join Ann Wylie for her online training session, “Anatomy of a 2.0 Release: Write Releases That Get Posted on Portals, Help Google Find Your Site, Reach Readers Online and More,” on June 28, at 3–4 p.m. This public relations writing training sesssion is free to PRSA members. Register Now

Today’s online releases serve several functions: They drive traffic to your site through search engine optimization, inform your readers and spread your message via journalists and bloggers.

To make your 21st-century release most effective:

Keep the headline short. Aim for 65 to 70 characters if you want your release to show up on Google News, according to a 2010 study by Schwartz Communications. Still, despite Google’s preferences, the average headline in Schwartz’s study was 123 characters long, and the longest more than 1,000 characters.

Get to the point quickly. Keep your lead to around 25 words. If it’s longer, then it starts looking too thick to invite readers. If it’s shorter, then news portals might not recognize it as a paragraph. Google News, for instance, rejects releases that are only bullet points and one-sentence paragraphs.

Tighten the release. The best length for a news release: 250 words. If your release is:

  • Longer than 700 words, then Google News may reject it for being too long.
  • Longer than 500 words, then portals may cut it off in the middle.
  • Shorter than 125 words, then Google News may reject it for being too short.

Plus, reading online is onerous. Releases of about 250 words are easier on people’s eyes.

Cut the fluff. Nobody searches for “world-class,” “cutting-edge” or “next-generation.” Hype not only clutters your copy, but it also dilutes your keywords. And that makes it harder for Google and other search engines to find your site.

Instead of piling on the jargon, write about what your product, service or idea will do for your clients and customers.

Write for people. Today’s releases serve two audiences: search engines and people. In the rush to optimize for the former, we sometimes forget the latter.

Sure, you’re going to place keywords and phrases in the page title tag, headline and maybe a few more places. But don’t “optimize” your release until you’ve rendered it unreadable to your intended audience — the people you hope will find your information through a search in the first place.

Copyright © 2012 Ann Wylie. All rights reserved.

This article originally appeared in the March 2012 issue of Public Relations Tactics.

Ann Wylie, president of Wylie Communications, serves as a PRSA writing trainer and presents writing workshops throughout the country. She is the author of more than a dozen learning tools, including “Writing for Social Media: How to Write Blog Postings, Tweets and Other Status Updates” and “Writing That Sells.”.

About the author

Ann Wylie

2 Comments

  • Hi Ann,

    Another seemingly old fashioned promotion technique to get more traffic
    to your website is the good old press release. Anytime you have a story
    to tell be sure to send out a press release. You can do both online and
    offline releases just ensure that you send them to the right people.

    Great post, thanks for sharing.

    Mark L.

  • So good to hear advice on making online press releases human readable. For far too long they have been keyword (shouldn’t that be keyPHRASE?) stuffed waffle.  One of the big problems of course is that when you write about a topic for a human audience, you would describe the keyphrase but not mention it repeatedly.

    Thankfully, if rumours of how Google’s penguin update works are to  be believed it now penalises content stuffed with keyphrases. Hoorah.
    Maybe finally online press releases will start to be written in the same well-crafted way that real-world ones for humans are written.

    OK, rant over 🙂

Leave a Reply to Mark Long X