PRSA ExecutiveBlog Logo
  • Home
  • About PRSA
  • Membership
  • Professional Development
  • Publications
  • Resources
  • PRSA Home

Currently viewing and reading

Funding the Future: The Rationale for a Dues Increase in 2012

Posted by Philip Tate in June 6th 2011  
Tweet

Update: PRSA announced in August that it plans to offer its entire catalogue of professional development webinars to its members — for free — starting in 2012.

It’s hard to believe that 10 years have passed since PRSA last increased its annual membership dues. Back then, our “old” website was “new,” Marc Kasky was suing Nike, and “How the U.S. Army Public Affairs Commands Responded to the Pentagon Attack on 9-11” was the must-see session at the International Conference.

After holding the line for a decade with no increase in the cost of membership dues, and with annual operating costs now outpacing revenue growth, PRSA has reached a critical point financially.  It’s for this reason that PRSA’s Board of Directors engaged a Business Model Task Force to audit PRSA’s financial condition, and to make recommendations to the Board of Directors for ensuring PRSA’s financial health into the future.

Among the Task Force’s recommendations — which it based on a comprehensive review of financial, membership and sponsorship trends; comparative data from other industry associations; and the evolution of PRSA’s product and service offerings — is an increase of up to $50 in the cost of dues for the regular member category.

On that basis, the PRSA Board of Directors has voted to ask the 2011 Leadership Assembly to approve a $30 increase in the cost of basic PRSA membership dues, to $255 from $225, effective Jan. 1, 2012. This is a modest increase, especially when you consider that membership dues would be priced at more than $270 today, had the cost been tied to increases in the Consumer Price Index since 2002.

The public relations profession is evolving rapidly, and if PRSA wants to stay ahead of the curve and still continue to meet its financial goal of returning 1 percent of its annual operating budget to its financial reserves, the time has come ask our members to increase their investment in PRSA through annual dues.

As national treasurer, I have seen firsthand how PRSA has balanced the introduction of new member benefits with the economic and competitive realities of the day, and the prudent way in which the Society has managed its finances.

Membership dues, which account for approximately 50 percent of PRSA’s revenue, have remained steady, but other revenue streams, such as professional development and Jobcenter, have declined in recent years due to the downturn in the economy and other market conditions.

Cost-control measures — which in recent years have included cost and operational efficiencies, elimination of underperforming products and services, staff reductions, a pay freeze, reducing Board travel and cutting sales and marketing expenditures — have eliminated $1.5 million in operating expenses from the PRSA budget. Further cuts risk compromising PRSA’s ability to deliver its current range of member benefits.

PRSA also has tried over the past decade to diversify its non-member revenue sources, including the appointment of a Non-Dues Task Force in 2009 to identify alternate means of generating income. That Task Force concluded that PRSA was not missing any practical opportunities to generate non-member revenue.

Having cut expenses and exhausted nearly every practicable source of new revenue — and all the while keeping membership dues at their 2002 levels — an increase in the cost of membership is now vital to our continued reinvestment in the Society. Among other things, funds from the proposed dues increase will be used to update existing benefits and create new ones; explore new products and services; create additional programming for senior professionals; enhance delivery systems by creating a mobile version of the PRSA website, introduce eLearning and create more digital publications; and otherwise modernize key infrastructure.

And because the issue really is one of keeping our members’ satisfaction high by ensuring PRSA’s relevance to their careers and professional success, we want — and need — your input.

In the weeks and months ahead, you can look forward to hearing more from us about the proposed dues increase, including official wording of the motion that will be put before the Leadership Assembly. But, our goal is to engage our Assembly Delegates and rank-and-file members in a rich, two-way discussion about the need for a dues increase, allowing your voices to be heard through the MyPRSA message forums, Assembly Delegate calls, blog posts, discussions with Board members and other means.

While I urge you to support the dues increase as proposed, your comments, suggestions, ideas and questions will help us ensure PRSA best meets your professional goals and aspirations.

If you’d like to learn more about PRSA’s financial condition or the Task Force’s recommendations, PRSA has set up a special page in the Governance section of the PRSA website; I hope you’ll take a moment at your convenience to review this information.

Again, we encourage you to share your thoughts, and we look forward to your feedback.

Philip Tate, APR, serves as treasurer on the PRSA Board of Directors and is senior vice president at Luquire George Andrews (LGA) in Charlotte, N.C.

under: Financial, Governance, PRSA News
Tags: Business Model Task Force, Consumer Price Index, CPI, dues increase, finances, Non-Revenue Task Force, PRSA
Share: Digg it del.icio.us Facebook Stumble it Technorati Twitter

Related Post

  • PRSA Financial Report: Looking at the First Nine Months of 2011 (October 14th, 2011)
  • PRSA’s 2010 Financials in Perspective (April 12th, 2011)
  • 2009: A Year of New Beginnings at PRSA (December 22nd, 2009)
  • Despite Challenging Environment, PRSA Projects Small Surplus for ’09 (October 30th, 2009)
  • Against Challenging Backdrop, PRSA Achieves Solid 2008 Financial Results (May 5th, 2009)
← Older Comments
  • Pingback: Phoenix PRSA » PRSA Membership Dues Survey

  • Pingback: PRSA’s Proposed 2012 Dues Increase By Sarah Siewert | prnewpros

  • Iebushaw

    I understand the economic necessity of your decision.  I do think you should take another look at your professional development business model.  Charging $150 and $250 for a Webinar is cost prohibitive for many of us.  I would have engaged in many of them if they were offered at less than $50.  As an adjunct lecturer and an independent practitioner, I don’t have the luxury of an unlimited budget.  But I am interested in keeping up with current trends and methods, and I do appreciate your professional development efforts.

  • Rosanna Fiske

    Thanks for your feedback. As we noted in an August announcement (http://bit.ly/oGWfk1), with passage of the proposed dues increase, we plan to offer the entire catalogue of PRSA’s
    professional development webinars to all members — for free — starting in 2012. This represents nearly $2,000 in annual savings for members who participate in one PRSA webinar per month. It’s also consistent with the findings of PRSA’s 2011 Membership Value Perception and Satisfaction Survey, which confirm the high value that members, such as you, place on webinar
    offerings.

    Your point about increasing the number and frequency of in-person seminars, conferences and other PRSA networking events is well taken and certainly one we will be exploring in the weeks and months ahead as we continue to evaluate PRSA’s professional development offerings.

    You can find a full listing of new and updated features that have been included in PRSA memberships since 2002 (the last time PRSA dues were increased) here: http://bit.ly/kTypjj. As you can see, during a time of increasing economic constraints in the U.S., we have added numerous member benefits, while simultaneously cutting costs and added additional member
    value. We feel this has continued to allow PRSA to be the hub, as you aptly
    phrase it, for advancing the public relations profession and the professional.

    Rosanna M. Fiske, APR
    Chair and CEO, PRSA

     

  • Pingback: Leadership Assembly Approves Membership Dues Increase

← Older Comments
« The Changing MO of CCOs and CMOs
Making the ‘Business Case for PR’ with Tomorrow’s Leaders »

Subscribe to the PRSA blog.

  • Feed Icon via RSS Feed or eMail


    Your email is safe. Privacy Policy.

Welcome



PRSAY is a forum for PRSA members and other public relations professionals to engage in a dialogue with PRSA leaders, exchange viewpoints, and share perspectives on issues of concern to the Society and the public relations industry as a whole. The views and opinions expressed here are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the official policies or positions of PRSA.

Search

Join PRSA

  • With your PRSA membership, you will:

    • Stay on top of emerging public relations trends and industry news.
    • Be a part of a vibrant community of more than 22,000 public relations professionals.
    • Accelerate your career -- at any level.

PRSA on Twitter

#prsa on Twitter

Categories

    • #PRin2012 (13)
    • Accreditation (8)
    • Advocacy (150)
    • Awards (4)
    • Black History Month (10)
    • Board of Directors (17)
    • bylaws (7)
    • Careers (11)
    • Chapters (9)
    • Conferences (4)
    • Counselors Academy (4)
    • Crisis Communications (13)
    • CSR (5)
    • Districts (3)
    • Diversity (26)
    • Ethics (73)
    • Financial (7)
    • Friday Five (17)
    • Governance (12)
    • Guest Posts (44)
    • Industry Trends (62)
    • Intelligence (13)
    • International Conference (7)
    • Learning (10)
    • Measurement (5)
    • Member Benefits (17)
    • Membership (12)
    • Multicultural Marketing (3)
    • National Assembly (13)
    • Network (2)
    • Networking (6)
    • Nominating Committee (3)
    • Professional Development (16)
    • PRSA Foundation (2)
    • PRSA Leadership (25)
    • PRSA News (38)
    • PRSSA (8)
    • Public Affairs (4)
    • Public Relations Defined (3)
    • Public relations measurement (5)
    • Publications (3)
    • Pulse of the Profession (36)
    • recession (7)
    • Regulation (1)
    • Regulatory Issues (8)
    • Reputation (37)
    • Research (11)
    • Resources (10)
    • Sections (5)
    • Silver Anvil (2)
    • Social Media (29)
    • State of the Society (12)
    • Technology (1)
    • The Business Case for Public Relations (46)
    • The PRSA Interview (1)
    • Trust (24)
    • Uncategorized (17)
    • Universal Accreditation Board (1)
    • Video (2)
    • Web site (1)

Archives

Recent Entries

  • Friday Five: Measurement as a Second Language
  • Why Professional Communicators Should Care About CISPA
  • Friday Five: Advertising Faces Challenges in a Digital and Social Age
  • Friday Five: Key Learnings in a Social Landscape
  • No Grand Slam for Miami Marlins’ PR Practices

Recent Comments

  • Marvin Gurgold in A Tribute to Jean Way Schoonover (1…
  • Dennielle Howes… in Analysis: PR Lessons From The Penn …
  • Facebook, Burso… in PR Pros: Haven’t We Learned Anyth…
  • Link Ch. 12 … in Occupy Wall Street Abandoned PR 101…
  • Stop Worrying a… in Merely ‘Image Men’? Hardly

Most Comments

  • Public Relations Won’t Fix Penn State’s Crisis  (48)
  • Paid or Unpaid, Time to Evaluate PR's Use of Interns (34)
  • To Remove — or Not To Remove — the APR Requirement for Board Service (31)
  • ‘Prize-Rigging’ Can Undermine Your Brand’s Online Promotion (27)
  • #PRin2012: 12 Trends That Will Change Public Relations  (27)
©2008-2012 PRSAY – What Do You Have to Say?
Powered by WordPress 3.3.1
Box-Tube Box Modulize WordPress Theme By Dezzain Studio
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Membership
  • Professional Development
  • Publications
  • Resources
  • PRSA Home
  • Blog Policy