PRSA ExecutiveBlog Logo
  • Home
  • About PRSA
  • Membership
  • Professional Development
  • Publications
  • Resources
  • PRSA Home

online reputation management's tag archives

Thinking of Using a Fake News Site? Think Again.

Posted by Denis Wolcott in November 8th 2011  
Tweet

Editor’s Note: The following is a guest post by Denis Wolcott, APR, of the PRSA Los Angeles Chapter. The post is an update to a previous commentary piece he wrote for PRSAY about the ethical concerns of a Los Angeles-area water district agency engaging in fake news production practices to secure positive media coverage.

Credit The Los Angeles Times for not giving up on a story.

As much as I hate to see a water agency that does great work remain in the newspaper’s cross hairs, and as much as I hate to see someone in public relations getting slammed in print . . . the public relations profession needs to take notice and learn from this one.

And, the water district may want to ask for help from PRSA.

The latest Times story about the Central Basin water district of Southern California is an update to its previous article about the water district’s effort to secure positive coverage. The water district has been in bitter battles with another water district, which also is using deception on the web in attacking Central Basin.

As this blog wrote when the original story first broke, paying for positive coverage is full of danger.

This is a preview of Thinking of Using a Fake News Site? Think Again.. Read the full post (553 words, estimated 2:13 mins reading time)

Continue reading " Thinking of Using a Fake News Site? Think Again. "

No Comment
under: Advocacy, Ethics, Guest Posts
Tags: Ethics Month 2011, Google, media relations, online reputation management, pay for play, paying for coverage, Publicity
Share: Digg it del.icio.us Facebook Stumble it Technorati Twitter

The Ethical Perils of Paying for Positive Media Coverage

Posted by Denis Wolcott in September 13th 2011  
Tweet

Editor’s Note: To commemorate PRSA Ethics Month, PRSAY is running a month-long series of posts on important ethics issues facing the public relations profession. This is the third post in the series. An archive of ethics-related posts can be found here.

Sooner or later, reporters will find out when you pay for positive news coverage.

Case in point: A Sept. 13, 2011, front-page report in The Los Angeles Times about a local water district spending nearly $200,000 to place positive stories on a “news” site that gets indexed by Google news.

The water district has justified this as a legitimate expense and tactic because it is generating more traffic to its website and more interest in water conservation than sending out the typical news release.

So, here is a water district that I know very well, and which has battled a series of negative news articles and other attacks. I can certainly sympathize with this district: As these attacks grew over the Internet, it sought solutions to generate “balance” to the coverage.

But, as we see by the scathing news article, the solution ends up generating more negative coverage.

Worse? The tactic also creates issues for all other public relations professionals who are conducting their business within the ethical boundaries established by PRSA and from decades of experience acting with full disclosure.

This is a preview of The Ethical Perils of Paying for Positive Media Coverage. Read the full post (638 words, estimated 2:33 mins reading time)

Continue reading " The Ethical Perils of Paying for Positive Media Coverage "

5 Comments
under: Advocacy, Ethics, Guest Posts
Tags: Ethics Month 2011, Google, media relations, online reputation management, pay for play, paying for coverage, Publicity
Share: Digg it del.icio.us Facebook Stumble it Technorati Twitter

Subscribe to the PRSA blog.

  • Feed Icon via RSS Feed or eMail


    Your email is safe. Privacy Policy.

Welcome



PRSAY is a forum for PRSA members and other public relations professionals to engage in a dialogue with PRSA leaders, exchange viewpoints, and share perspectives on issues of concern to the Society and the public relations industry as a whole. The views and opinions expressed here are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the official policies or positions of PRSA.

Search

Join PRSA

  • With your PRSA membership, you will:

    • Stay on top of emerging public relations trends and industry news.
    • Be a part of a vibrant community of more than 22,000 public relations professionals.
    • Accelerate your career -- at any level.

PRSA on Twitter

#prsa on Twitter

Categories

Archives

Switch site

    • Switch to our mobile site

Switch to our mobile site

Recent Entries

  • Friday Five: Engagement Is a Winning Tool When Used Properly
  • Cost Controls, Market Performance Help PRSA Best 2012 Financial Goals
  • Friday Five: Ad Placements Act as Good Indicator of Strength in Audience Connection
  • The Future Starts Today
  • Friday Five: Reshaping PR for the 21st Century

Recent Comments

  • Allie Goatley in Public Relations: A Lifelong Learni…
  • Identify indust… in #PRin2012: 12 Trends That Will Chan…
  • 5 PR tips from … in Of PR and Protest: 'The Times They …
  • Christina Gidde… in Public Relations: A Lifelong Learni…
  • Corinne Fisher in Friday Five: Reputation Matters…W…

Most Comments

  • Public Relations Won’t Fix Penn State’s Crisis  (49)
  • #PRin2012: 12 Trends That Will Change Public Relations  (41)
  • Paid or Unpaid, Time to Evaluate PR's Use of Interns (34)
  • To Remove — or Not To Remove — the APR Requirement for Board Service (31)
  • ‘Prize-Rigging’ Can Undermine Your Brand’s Online Promotion (27)
©2008-2013 PRSAY – What Do You Have to Say?
Powered by WordPress 3.4.1
Box-Tube Box Modulize WordPress Theme By Dezzain Studio
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Membership
  • Professional Development
  • Publications
  • Resources
  • PRSA Home
  • Terms of Use